Thursday, March 7, 2013
The Open Source Pioneer
When we think of the term “computer” not a lot come in mind; just
a box that is connected to a monitor with a keyboard and a mouse and,
nowadays, laptops and smartphones. When we think
of key figures and their contributions to the computer industry,
again, not a lot come in mind; Bill Gates with Microsoft Windows and
Steve Jobs with the Macintosh. However, the computer industry is much
more deep and contains many more masterminds than just those three,
who just found themselves in the right place at the right time, and
it is not limited only to the operating system of Microsoft, Windows,
nor the one of Apple, OS X, and their products.
On the 25th
of August in 1991, a young Finish student of the university of
Helsinki posted a thread to a newsgroup website of the time,
comp.os.minix, with which he was introducing a new operating system
to the world: “...I'm
doing a (free) operating system,” he said, “just a hobby, won't
be big and professional like gnu,” yet he would be proven wrong in
the following years since it is being used by millions around the
world today. (“What
would you like to see most in minix?”
comp.os.minix)

Operating
systems are the set of software that utilizes the hardware of the
computer in order to make their use easy for the end user. Without
operating systems, today, we wouldn’t have the advancement we do;
we wouldn’t have desktop computers or laptops, the Internet, cell
phones or we would not be even able to send “Curiosity” to Mars,
140 million miles away from out home planet. Even the computer that
sent Neil Armstrong and the rest of the Apollo 11 crew to the Moon
“ran” a simple real-time operating system. Without the “ApolloGuidance Computer”, the mission would be simply impossible.
So,
operating systems are more than a crucial part of computers, and
their development requires a lot of intelligence, time, effort and...
coffee, especially twenty years ago, when there was not as enough
documentation and instruction sheets that would provide a potential
kernel developer sufficient information on how a processor works and
what instructions are available. This means that Torvalds was an
intuitive and hardworking person who overcame many difficulties to
take his development on Linux from a hobby to a highly professional
job, creating a product on which many people depend on.
Now,
what does the term “free and open source” refer to? It refers to
the fact that the software, in this case the operating system named
Linux, is completely liberally licensed, free of charge and the
source code of its kernel is also free for anyone to view, modify and
share, as opposed to Microsoft Windows and OS X which are the exact
opposite: proprietary and closed source; only people that enroll in
the development process are allowed to view the source code and
everyone else can rent the software by purchasing a license and
anything that opposes these facts is illegal.
The
fact that Linux was the first free and open source kernel was what
attracted a lot of programmers into its development and that is what
made Torvalds the pioneer of Free and Open Source, not only operating
systems but, software in general. His love towards this ideology was
his key to success since nothing else like this had existed before,
except for Richard Stallman’s equivalent open source kernel “GNUHurd,” which was just an idea at the time and up to this very day
has not been “completed.”

Back
in the 90s, when Windows started to gain its reputation in the
market, “people conceived the idea that if you wanted something
good, you would also have to pay a few more bucks and that’s why
everyone rushed to the market to buy Windows 95,” says Constantinos
Canavos, the editor of OSArena, a Free and Open Source related news
website. Microsoft slowly dominated the international software market
at the same time that Linus was taking his first steps in the same
field. However, Microsoft was threatened by the new Free operating
system waging a “cold war” against it. The reason: More and more
server systems would transition to the free, and better functioning,
alternative – Linux – leading them to lose a tremendous share of
that side of the market and feared that the same would happen to its
pricy, and not so well functioning, desktop.
Constantinos
also sais that “Microsoft
never
came in a direct “collision” with Linux, neither did they
contested Microsoft, as rumors wish to say,”
however, in order to make Linus “cave,” Microsoft started a
campaign named “Get the facts” in 2002 with which the popular
firm gave some “facts” to people as of how Windows is the tool
they should choose over some free alternative. Linus, as Constantinos
mentioned, “just
in the spirit of the geek humor said some things,” which did hurt
the other side: “Software is like sex... it's better when it's
free.”
A few years later the page was “killed” replacing it with a page
that compared Windows Server Edition to the Linux servers and a
little later it ended up getting completely removed from the servers
of Microsoft, returning just a 404 error. (“Microsoft
kills its 'Get the Facts' anti-Linux site,” August 2007, Mary Jo
Foley)
Regardless
of the criticism which did get personal as Linus said, he did not
even think of abandoning his project. Even later on in time he would
mention this dispute with humor. In an interview, specifically, he
stated that it was not his intention “to
ruin Microsoft. This is just an unintended side effect.” And that
was true, since Microsoft could see that they were starting to lose
to Linux, as mentioned in “Facts
behind Microsoft's anti-Linux campaign,” by Matt Asay in January of
2009. In his article, he quoted the exact words of the, then, CEO of
Microsoft Jim Allchin that they
are not on a path to win against Linux, but they must change many
things, in an effort to “tune down” the dispute. From his side,
Linus said that “Microsoft
is not bad, they are just very casual and make crappy operating
systems.”
Linus
had also stated that if Microsoft eventually started writing code and
creating applications and software for Linux, he would have won,
something that would be proven correct years later, today, since
Microsoft became the number one contributor to the Linux project
passing in front of key founders of the project. So, by
doing all the above, Microsoft, by itself, drew attention towards the
first major FOSS project making Torvalds a major threat or partner,
as they wish to call him; according to the video “Microsoft
just want to say,” which was published last year on the official
Linux Foundation YouTube channel, Microsoft admitted that they put
effort into “scaring off” Linux and ended with the rhetorical
question “Microsoft and Linux?” Is this an effort to make things
right or just another game? I guess time will show.
Therefore,
to conclude, Linus Torvalds worked hard on his inspiration and made
his work a public effort, but also managed to maintain it throughout
the years of its existence leaving any threat or resentfulness aside
with his humor. He even incorporated his humor into naming the newer
versions of the Linux kernel: “Sheep on Meth,” or to point out
the problems by cursing nVidia in public. was the codename of a
previous version. Regardless of all this, he is the one who was
awarded with the Joint Millenium Technology Prize.
Work Cited
- Asay, Matt. “Facts behind Microsoft's anti-Linux campaign” news.cnet.com, January 19, 2009
- Foley, Mary. “Microsoft kills its 'Get the Facts' anti-Linux site” zdnet.com, August 23, 2007
- Documentary, “Linus Torvalds” http://goo.gl/rNEYn
- Noyes, Katherine. “Linus Torvalds Wins Joint Millennium Technology Prize” PCWorld, June 13, 2012
- Torvalds, Linus Benedict. “What would you like to see most in minix?” comp.os.minix, August 25, 1991
- The Linux Foundation, “Microsoft just want to say” http://goo.gl/Oc1Ma
- Aalto University Ace, “Aalto Talk with Linus Torvalds” http://goo.gl/eCh75
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (
Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.